Without ‘bad’ you don’t know what ‘good’ is. I made that comment this past week in Sunday school class with some disagreement from others. Some people may look at ‘good’ and ‘bad’ differently than me. I see it as points on a scale, but on the same scale. In order to rank something as ‘good’, you would be giving it a value. There is no ‘value’ without something to compare it to. That is why I believe that you must have ‘bad’ to recognize the ‘good’. Like colors on a chart, some maybe darker than others, but without one to compare to another, how could you claim one to be dark or light.
Without ‘bad’ you don’t know what ‘good’ is. I made that comment this past week in Sunday school class with some disagreement from others. Some people may look at ‘good’ and ‘bad’ differently than me. I see it as points on a scale, but on the same scale. In order to rank something as ‘good’, you would be giving it a value. There is no ‘value’ without something to compare it to. That is why I believe that you must have ‘bad’ to recognize the ‘good’. Like colors on a chart, some maybe darker than others, but without one to compare to another, how could you claim one to be dark or light.
ReplyDelete